Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 12:43:10 08/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
I think we have had enough threads on this, and seen proof enough of it, i've never said this about Tigre and never will. I'll not say it from the latest Fritz versions either and most likely not from rebel 11 also if it's improved and using nullmove nowadays. Position d4-d5 in the POS LCT testset is not at all positional. it's tactical you play d5, then black captures it, and you hurry up the rook till it gotta leave then d5 is hung. That's tactical not positional. Testset makers aren't completely objective also... But please answer a question to me. If you just use nullmove in a program, no other forms of pruning, how many plies do you need to solve bs2830 position Kg3!! Short-Timman Linares 19xx On August 18, 2000 at 13:59:03, Christophe Theron wrote: >On August 18, 2000 at 07:17:16, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 18, 2000 at 04:32:38, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>I am wondering what result's Diep get's on the Positional section of the LCT II >>>test? >> >>I have not tried that test lately. Diep sure is a slow searcher. >>So even if it solves them all, then it has to be said: other programs >>are real quick in solving them, matter of tuning to known testsets. > > > >You really have nothing better to do than throwing mud to your fellows chess >programmers? > > > Christophe > > > >>I'll have a look for you this evening.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.