Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:51:44 08/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2000 at 17:13:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 18, 2000 at 12:45:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 18, 2000 at 02:55:29, Yar wrote: >> >>>RIMMs are not so fast as DDR SDRAM 1.6Gb/s compare to 2.1Gb/s. 2.5ns is not true >>>memory can't work at 2.5ns >> >> >>Memory can work at 2.5ns or even faster, just not anything based on DRAM >>(capacitors). Unfortunately engineers haven't found a way to get around >>resistance, capacitance and inductance yet. But hopefully, one day... >>who knows? :) > >they say 100Mhz SDRAM is not much faster as 66Mhz edoram. > >However it speeded up my draughtsprogram 2 times. >So a 2 times faster program because of 100Mhz sdram compared to EDOram. > >so if i see 2.5ns SDRAM then i smile wide and pray it gets cheaper >soon :) If you see 2.5ns DRAM memory, you need to go to a detox center asap. You will have some _serious_ drugs in your system to see DRAM that fast. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.