Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:27:53 08/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2000 at 16:39:18, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On August 20, 2000 at 16:04:02, robert blackwell wrote: > >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "2000.08.20"] >>[Round "-"] >>[White "M-CHESS 7.0"] >>[Black "JUNIOR6a"] >>[Result "1-0"] >>[BlackClock "1655"] >>[TimeControl "1800"] >>[WhiteClock "722"] >> >>1. e4 c5 2. Ne2 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nb5 d6 6. Bf4 e5 7. Be3 a6 8. >>N5c3 Nf6 9. Bg5 Be7 10. Nd2 O-O 11. Nc4 Be6 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. Qxd6 Bg5 14. >>Nd5 Rc8 15. Bd3 Nd4 16. c3 Nf5 17. Qxd8 Rcxd8 18. Rd1 Nh4 19. O-O Ng6 20. >>Bc2 h6 21. Bb3 Rfe8 22. Nc7 Bxc4 23. Bxc4 Rxd1 24. Rxd1 Rd8 25. Nd5 h5 26. >>g3 h4 27. Kg2 Rc8 28. Bb3 Kf8 29. Kf3 Bd8 30. Ne3 Be7 31. Rd7 Rb8 32. Bd5 >>b6 33. b4 b5 34. Ra7 Rc8 35. c4 bxc4 36. Bxc4 a5 37. bxa5 Nh8 38. Rb7 Bc5 >>39. a6 Bxe3 40. Kxe3 Rxc4 41. Rb8+ Ke7 42. a7 Rc3+ 43. Kd2 Ra3 44. a8=Q >>Rxa8 45. Rxa8 1-0 A beautiful game by Mchess pro! This games show that mchess is >>in my imho show good anti computer strategy! :) > >Nice game. The Sicilian Paulsen, a rare continuation with 13...Bg5, evidently >well researched by Sandro Necchi, the Italian master responsible for the Mchess >opening book. I can't see any "anti-computer strategy" in MChess's play. I >think that Black was doomed after playing the bad 16...Nf5 instead of simply >capturing Bxd5... My Junior5.9 simply captured by Bxd5(evaluation 0.06 pawns for black at depth 15 and 0.16 pawns for black at depth 16) I guess that Junior6 can also capture at d5(maybe the time control of the game was too fast) It wanted to play Rxc4 at depth 9 but changed it mind at depth 12 and prefered the move Bxd5. If I give it 81 minutes per game on pentium200 it also plays Bxd5 at depth 13 and it never considers Nf5. Only at fast time control(when I give it 30 minutes per game on p200) it wants to play Nf5 at depth 11 and does not change its mind at depth 12). I think that Junior had not enough time and at longer time control mchess is not going to win the same opening. I guess that from Junior's point of view it lost because of a tactical mistake Nf5(Junior simply did not calculate deep enough). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.