Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 16:03:50 08/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2000 at 17:27:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 20, 2000 at 16:39:18, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>On August 20, 2000 at 16:04:02, robert blackwell wrote: >> >>>[Event "?"] >>>[Site "?"] >>>[Date "2000.08.20"] >>>[Round "-"] >>>[White "M-CHESS 7.0"] >>>[Black "JUNIOR6a"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[BlackClock "1655"] >>>[TimeControl "1800"] >>>[WhiteClock "722"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Ne2 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e6 5. Nb5 d6 6. Bf4 e5 7. Be3 a6 8. >>>N5c3 Nf6 9. Bg5 Be7 10. Nd2 O-O 11. Nc4 Be6 12. Bxf6 Bxf6 13. Qxd6 Bg5 14. >>>Nd5 Rc8 15. Bd3 Nd4 16. c3 Nf5 17. Qxd8 Rcxd8 18. Rd1 Nh4 19. O-O Ng6 20. >>>Bc2 h6 21. Bb3 Rfe8 22. Nc7 Bxc4 23. Bxc4 Rxd1 24. Rxd1 Rd8 25. Nd5 h5 26. >>>g3 h4 27. Kg2 Rc8 28. Bb3 Kf8 29. Kf3 Bd8 30. Ne3 Be7 31. Rd7 Rb8 32. Bd5 >>>b6 33. b4 b5 34. Ra7 Rc8 35. c4 bxc4 36. Bxc4 a5 37. bxa5 Nh8 38. Rb7 Bc5 >>>39. a6 Bxe3 40. Kxe3 Rxc4 41. Rb8+ Ke7 42. a7 Rc3+ 43. Kd2 Ra3 44. a8=Q >>>Rxa8 45. Rxa8 1-0 A beautiful game by Mchess pro! This games show that mchess is >>>in my imho show good anti computer strategy! :) >> >>Nice game. The Sicilian Paulsen, a rare continuation with 13...Bg5, evidently >>well researched by Sandro Necchi, the Italian master responsible for the Mchess >>opening book. I can't see any "anti-computer strategy" in MChess's play. I >>think that Black was doomed after playing the bad 16...Nf5 instead of simply >>capturing Bxd5... > >My Junior5.9 simply captured by Bxd5(evaluation 0.06 pawns for black at depth 15 >and 0.16 pawns for black at depth 16) > >I guess that Junior6 can also capture at d5(maybe the time control of the game >was too fast) >It wanted to play Rxc4 at depth 9 but changed it mind at depth 12 and prefered >the move Bxd5. > >If I give it 81 minutes per game on pentium200 it also plays Bxd5 at depth 13 >and it never considers Nf5. >Only at fast time control(when I give it 30 minutes per game on p200) it wants >to play Nf5 at depth 11 and does not change its mind at depth 12). > >I think that Junior had not enough time and at longer time control mchess is not >going to win the same opening. > >I guess that from Junior's point of view it lost because of a tactical mistake >Nf5(Junior simply did not calculate deep enough). > >Uri Just like humans in that we also make more tactical mistakes at faster time controls and less mistakes when we have more time in our games! Regards,Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.