Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:40:04 12/01/97
Go up one level in this thread
First my best wishes to the Nimzo and the Cilkchess team ! My only question is: When I study the participant-list - and - because I am prejudiced - looking for intelligent programs, I have problems to find them ! Could it be that this DUTCH championship was more a championship of the fast-searchers ?? :-) (Now dozens of offended programmers will hopefully explain me that I am an ass... and should stop posting these "insults"). Where was Rebel9 ? How intelligent was Cilkchess THIS TIME ? Don ? Is it possible to get statements from the programmers involved ? Which version number was The King ? Johann ? John - what have you done to Zarkov in the meantime ? More knowledge ? Can we discuss the ranking here ? Can we get some statements ?? Would be nice, thanks. > 1 Nimzo 98 10.0/11 67.5 59.50 > 2 Cilkchess 2.0 9.5/11 69.0 56.50 > 3 The King 7.5/11 69.5 41.75 > 4 Zarkov 7.5/11 64.5 35.50 > 5 Arthur 7.0/11 65.5 32.25 > 6 Kallisto II 7.0/11 65.5 31.50 > 7 Ant 6.5/11 62.0 27.50 > 8 Diep 5.5/11 61.5 19.75 > 9 Schach 3.0 5.0/11 62.5 16.25 >10 Dappet 4.5/11 57.5 11.75 >11 Goldbar 4.5/11 54.0 14.50 >12 Lchess 4.0 4.0/11 54.5 10.00 >13 Rookie 2.0 4.0/11 52.5 12.50 >14 Zzzzz 4.2 3.5/11 56.0 8.50 >15 Bionic 1.5/11 52.5 2.50 >16 Achess 0.5/11 53.5 2.25 > >For more details check > >http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/thstorm/docc97.htm > >Best wishes >Andreas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.