Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: More moves Diep - Junior on www.kasparov.com

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 13:09:17 08/21/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 21, 2000 at 15:21:04, Shay Bushinsky wrote:

>On August 21, 2000 at 15:12:56, Sylvain Renard wrote:
>
>>On August 21, 2000 at 14:52:09, Shay Bushinsky wrote:
>>
>>>Junior's evaluation of the current position (move 34) is 0.0
>>
>>  Hello,
>>0.0 , are you sure?
>>After 35Rxb6 here's Junior 6a analysis :
>>New position
>>[D]6k1/3r1pr1/1R6/3pPp2/1p6/p6P/PPP3P1/1K3R2 b - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Junior 6.0:
>>
>>1...axb2 2.Kxb2 Rxg2 3.Rxb4
>>  ²  (0.40)   depth: 3   00:00:00
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 axb2 3.Rxf5 Rc7 4.Rxb2
>>  ±  (0.73)   depth: 6   00:00:00  8kN
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 axb2 3.Rxf5 Rc7 4.Rxb2
>>  ±  (0.73)   depth: 6   00:00:00  8kN
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 axb2 3.Rb8+ Kg7 4.Rxb2 Re7 5.a4 Rxe5 6.Rb7
>>  ±  (0.84)   depth: 9   00:00:00  56kN
>>1...Rxg2!
>>  ²  (0.54)   depth: 12   00:00:02  1266kN
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 Rc7 3.c3 axb2 4.Rxb2 Rg3 5.h4 Rcxc3 6.Rxf5
>>  ²  (0.49)   depth: 12   00:00:02  1619kN
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 Rc7 3.bxa3 Rgxc2 4.h4 R7c3 5.a4 Kf8 6.Rxf5 Rc1+ 7.Kb2 R1c2+
>>8.Ka1 Kg7
>>  ±  (0.71)   depth: 15   00:00:12  7744kN
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 Rc7 3.bxa3 Rgxc2 4.h4 Kg7 5.Rxf5 Rc1+ 6.Kb2 R1c2+ 7.Ka1 Rh2 8.h5
>>Rcc2
>>  ²  (0.69)   depth: 18   00:01:26  53906kN, tb=6
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 Rc7 3.bxa3 Rgxc2 4.h4 Kg7 5.Rxf5 Rc1+ 6.Kb2 R1c2+ 7.Ka1 R7c3
>>8.Rg5+ Kh7 9.Rbg4 Rc1+ 10.Kb2 R1c2+
>>  ²  (0.62)   depth: 19   00:03:36  129071kN, tb=19
>>1...Rxg2 2.Rxb4 Rc7 3.bxa3 Rgxc2 4.Rd4 R2c3 5.Rxd5 Rxa3 6.Rxf5 Rb7+ 7.Kc1 Rxa2
>>8.h4 Rc7+ 9.Kd1 Rcc2 10.h5
>>  ²  (0.60)   depth: 20   00:07:57  278168kN, tb=86
>>
>
>Yes. It's a complete new version (perhaps we should throw it away after
>this tournament :) but there are big differences in it.
>Btw, Junior is playing on a 700Mhz Intel processor.
>
>-- Shay

I guess that you decided that you want to win the tournament and not get 3th or
4th place.
I guess that you understood that without a complete new version you have small
chances to win.

You probably decided to gamble by using a new version that you had not enough
time to test.

Is my guess correct?

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.