Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 14:09:52 08/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2000 at 16:40:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 21, 2000 at 16:28:03, Imran Hendley wrote: > >>On August 21, 2000 at 15:36:31, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Again using my Athlon 800 Mhz 128 SDRAM and using Junior 6a, the game should end >>>in favor of DIEP. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>How can you analyze a game at less time than the time control of the game!?! >>Doesn't that defeat the purpose of analysis??? > >No, the purpose of the analysis in this case is to predict the result of the >game before you get more information and not to get the result if the players >avoid mistakes. > >If you use long time control you will get result of the analysis only after you >get the result of the games so you defeat the target of the analysis because it >is not interesting to predict the result of the game after you know the result. > >Uri Diep is not as good as Junior in the endgames, if junior had White it would have won the game. That is the reason why I used the stronger program at a given midlegame position to predict a result. Thanks Uri for clarifying the purpose of analizing at a shorter time control. I must say that not to many programs are as good as Junior at the endgame. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.