Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:06:53 08/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2000 at 13:25:40, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On August 22, 2000 at 13:18:54, Pete R. wrote: > >>[Event "WMCC 2000"] >>[Site "London"] >>[Date "2000.08.22"] >>[Round "4"] >>[White "Rebel"] >>[Black "Shredder"] >>[Result "*"] >>[ECO "C47"] >> >> >>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Nxe4 6. Qe2 f5 7. Ng5 d3 8. >>cxd3 Nd4 9. Qh5+ g6 10. Qh4 c6 11. dxe4 cxd5 12. exd5 Bg7 13. Kd1 h6 14. Nf3 >>Nxf3 15. Qxd8+ Kxd8 16. gxf3 d6 17. Rg1 g5 18. h4 g4 19. Be2 h5 20. Bg5+ Kc7 >>21. Rc1+ Kb8 22. fxg4 fxg4 23. f3 gxf3 24. Bxf3 Be5 25. Rc4 Bf5 26. Bf4 Bd3 27. >>Bxe5 dxe5 28. Rc3 e4 29. Be2 Bxe2+ 30. Kxe2 a5 31. Rg5 Ra6 32. Rc4 Rf6 33. Rxe4 >>Kc7 34. Re7+ Kd6 35. Rxb7 Rf4 36. Rb6+ Kc5 37. Rc6+ Kb5 38. Rc3 Rxh4 39. d6+ >> >>Fritz 6a disagrees with 31. Rg5, saying Ke3 is better. Looks like black might >>be able to draw the current position though. > >Shredder tends to agree with you. Right now the eval of 4.22 is dropping to >0.91. Remember that Shredder uses tablebases, while Rebel doesn't. > >Enrique This is a tablebases draw KPP vs KP moves 49-54 were not needed. There were strange bugs in the tournament but I think that we can trust shredder to draw tablebase draw. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.