Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 13:25:27 08/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
We don't need more power, we need programs that understand how to play in different STYLES. True mastery of chess programming will show itself as the ability to create programs that understand various styles, not just programs that are strong. What the various styles are, of course, is a matter of debate, but certainly some of them have been modeled by the world's best. Tal, for example, and Petrosian. Roger On August 22, 2000 at 16:21:36, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Dear CCC, > >Just think boys and girls, in less than a year from now we will have the Pentium >Four machines that run at 1400 MHz with a 400 Mhz bus and a data throughput of >3.2 GBytes per second. Now you know that with all that speed we can have >programs with enormous databases. Do we want the programs for analysis only or >do we want to lose to them 100% of the time? > >A while back I was talking about interactive programs that mimic voluptuous >female chess opponents. Well I guess that we will all be totally addicted to >playing Laura Croft and enjoying the slow torture. It could be fun. >Chessmistress 1.01 Hmmmmm? > >Any comments Fernando? > >Tim Frohlick
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.