Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Predictions of Round 5 ( 4 /7 correct in Round 4 )

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:33:10 08/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2000 at 19:16:38, Peter Skinner wrote:

>>>I am picking Rebel due to it has the white pieces and was impressive vs
>>>Shredder.
>>
>>I was not impressed.
>>It could not translate the advantage to a win.
>
>That was unfortunate, but I didn't even expect Rebel in that match, to me that
>was impressive.
>
>>It is not one of the top programs but it is also not one of the weakest
>>programs.
>>It lost on time against Junior only because of a bug and I guess that vincent
>>corrected the bug.
>
>Diep also lost today, I don't give it much of a shot. Vincent must be having
>fits of=ver there in London, we all know how proud he is of Diep, and he stated
>it is not a blitz program, but rather a program best suited for tournament time
>controls. Let's not forget last year where he barely got 3 points, and there was
>a much weaker field.

I do not think that the field was weaker last year and Diep had a lot of bugs in
this tournament because vincent had not enough time to test his parallel
program.

>
>>I believe that Diep is better than insomniac but every result is possible.
>>
>>I guess probabilities of 40% for Diep 30% for a draw and 30% for insomniac so
>>the best I can guess if I guess only one result is that Diep is going to win.
>>
>>Uri
>
>I am picking Insomniac all the way on this one.

I hope that you are right about it but I remember that Diep got 7 out of 15 when
insomniac got only 2.5 out of 15 in the millenium tournament.

You can download the games at
http://homepages.compuserve.de/hjsxy/page4.html

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.