Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:07:04 08/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2000 at 14:30:20, Keith Conary wrote: >I currently have an active account which runs Chess Tiger automatically on ICC >and I've found that running it with the suggested hash table increment of 4-8M >works well for fast times against computers only. But I get several draws and >losses to IMs and GMs with the small hash table settings. After increasing the >hash table size to 64M, I get the opposite effect, meaning I crush the humans >and lose to the computer at 5 3. Is there a medium that can be reached in >tigers' settings to balance the performance between humans and computers? > >Thanks > >Keith Can you explain a logical reason that a change in the hash tables gives opposite results against humans. The only logical change that I can understand against humans and not against computers is to play faster. Does 64 Mbytes hash play faster? If it does you can solve the problem by using faster time control and tell the program against humans 4 2 time control when the real time control is 5 3. If it does not play faster then your theory seems illogical. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.