Author: Uri Blass
Date: 17:08:46 08/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2000 at 19:03:14, Fernando Villegas wrote: >On August 23, 2000 at 10:24:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 23, 2000 at 10:06:53, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>On August 22, 2000 at 19:22:05, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On August 22, 2000 at 18:18:39, Fernando Villegas wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 22, 2000 at 16:21:36, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Dear CCC, >>>>>> >>>>>>Just think boys and girls, in less than a year from now we will have the Pentium >>>>>>Four machines that run at 1400 MHz with a 400 Mhz bus and a data throughput of >>>>>>3.2 GBytes per second. Now you know that with all that speed we can have >>>>>>programs with enormous databases. Do we want the programs for analysis only or >>>>>>do we want to lose to them 100% of the time? >>>>>> >>>>>>A while back I was talking about interactive programs that mimic voluptuous >>>>>>female chess opponents. Well I guess that we will all be totally addicted to >>>>>>playing Laura Croft and enjoying the slow torture. It could be fun. >>>>>>Chessmistress 1.01 Hmmmmm? >>>>>> >>>>>>Any comments Fernando? >>>>>> >>>>>>Tim Frohlick >>>>> >>>>>Hi Tim: >>>>>Well, I scarcely see a reason to be excited for the prospect of a chess machine >>>>>playing at that speed. For what, if even chessmaster 2100 running in a 286 can >>>>>give me a good mauling from time to time. So the only good reason for just a >>>>>faint spark of interest in that monster would be what you said about the >>>>>voluptuous female opponent. But, how much voluptuous? With that processing power >>>>>we should expect something much better that the lady of Ananova.com reading the >>>>>news. I suppose that Demi Moore puting her clothes off with each half a point of >>>>>score you can get over the program could be enough to become interested >>>> >>>>I am against this idea. >>>>I want to see more women play chess and I think that this kind of idea is not >>>>going to attract women. >>>> >>>>It is also easy to cheat and get the draw or wins against the program by using >>>>another program. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Come on, Uri, there are not ideas here, but jokes! Do not be so serious! >>>Fernando >> >>I do not think that it is funny. >>I also know from experience that Sarah does not like these posts and I do not >>want her to become angry. >> >>If I see this kind of posts again then I am going to ask the moderators to >>delete them. >> >>Uri > >ARE YOU THREATENING ME? Oh my God, I am trembling... >Sir: >a) you have none sense of humour, as it has been evident since ever. No problem, >but please, try not to exagerate. The fact that my sense of humour is not identical to your sense of humour does not say that I have no sense of humour see http://f22.parsimony.net/forum44091/messages/1037.htm >b) you presume as a reason the irated reaction of some other poster and you >declared yourself her nanny. I did not declare myself her nanny. That's preposterous. If Sarah becomes angry, why she >should do so ?, let her to play her moves. I prefer not to see discussions about this here. It cannot lead to something positive so this is probably my last post in this topic. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.