Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I don't think wmcc results is enough reliable, isn't it?

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 21:02:07 08/24/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2000 at 22:18:07, Charles Milton Ling wrote:

>It is hardly my place to comment on this, as my computer literacy is minimal,
>but I do know a little bit about statistics, and a bit more about Chess.
>
>I do not understand why such a tournament is *ever* held except on a
>uniform-platform basis.  A "level playing field" (I think it is called) is aimed
>at in all competitions; I fail to understand why this requirement is waived
>here.  (I do, of course, realize that processors are only part of the equation,
>but still...)

There are all sorts of computers out there.  Why punish people who develop for
weird ones by telling them they can't play?

This is an important point, even though in practice what happens is that people
with deep pockets or connections or good organizational talent get the fastest
Windows box they can.

A problem with a level playing field is that it is a generic vanilla white-bread
playing surface.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.