Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:47:01 08/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 25, 2000 at 14:35:02, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >On August 25, 2000 at 13:55:05, Eddie wrote: > >>On August 25, 2000 at 13:49:13, Shanti wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>>Now we only have to see Shredder in the SSDF lists. >>> >>>Shanti >> >>Shanti, >> >>Do we really need to see the numbers from SSDF ? Shredder wins all the >>Championships, plain and simple .... so do we really need to see the numbers? >>Winning Championships are way more important than numbers!! :)) Don't you >>agree ?! >>> >>> >>>On August 25, 2000 at 13:44:34, Eddie wrote: >>> >>>>On August 25, 2000 at 13:29:54, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 25, 2000 at 13:09:43, Eddie wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 25, 2000 at 13:05:25, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Shredder won the WMCCC 2000. Fritz has been a strong contender all the time and >>>>>>>won beautifully the last game. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>My congratulations to both, Stefan and Frans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Enrique >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes my congrats to Stefan also!! That's 2 years in a row ! :)) >>>>>> >>>>>>It was a great event ..... congrats to all of you!! >>>>> >>>>>It's actually three out of four. >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>>So, back to back Championships! And, three out of the last four?! What does >>>>it all mean? Sounds like the N.Y. Yankees, but it can't be ..... it's >>>>computer chess .... pretty awesome to me .... tell ya what, it's one heck of a >>>>way to boost one's ego !! :)) Just awesome .... > >My congratulations to Shredder. But after having won last years event _nothing >comes to mind_ of any real noise from shredder during the year to date. > >Maybe just better preparation than the rest (my guess). Shredder got a bad position out of book against nimzo. I think that it is not a result of better preperation. > >Time for shreddar to drop this nonsense and get tested by uscf and then we make >a judgement. Until then I am not a believer that it is the best of the best.. shredder4 is tested by the ssdf and it is number 4 in the ssdf list. The ssdf refuse to publish it's rating but it is clear that it is number 4 after Fritz,Junior and tiger(If you download the list in Dos format you can see that number 4 is missing. > >Biggest dissapointmens are Crafty and Diep. Biggest surprise SOS. My personnel >dissapointment was in Fritz. Fritz did a very good result. I do not think to be number 2 is a disappointment. I guess that the programmer of Fritz does not think that number 2 in WMCCC is a bad result for him. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.