Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 23:16:24 08/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 02:11:13, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On August 25, 2000 at 23:54:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On August 25, 2000 at 22:05:19, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>> PROGRAM CPU MHZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>> 1 Shredder K7 1000 *1 *2 *2½ *3 *3½ *4 *5 *6 *7 >>> 2 Fritz PIII 1000 *1 *2 *2½ *3 *3½ *4 *5 5½ 6½ >>> 3 Chess Tiger PIII 800 *1 1 1½ 2½ 3 3½ 4½ 5½ 6 >>> 4 Rebel PIII 800 *1 *2 2 2½ 3 3 4 5 6 >>> 5 Junior PIII 700 ½ 1½ *2½ *3 *3½ *4 4 5 5½ >>> 6 SOS PIII 667 ½ 1 1 2 3 *4 4 4½ 5½ >>> 7 Nimzo PIII 1000 *1 1 2 *3 *3½ *4 *5 5 5 >>> 8 Incomniac PIII 933 0 ½ 1½ 1½ 2 3 4 4 5 >>> 9 Zchess K7 800 0 1 1 2 3 3½ 3½ 4½ 4½ >>>10 Diep PIII 800 0 0 1 1 1½ 2½ 2½ 3½ 4 >>>11 Crafty Alpha 500 *1 1 2 2 2½ 2½ 3½ 3½ 3½ >>>12 Francesca Cel 600 0 1 1½ 1½ 2 3 3 3 3½ >>>13 XiniX Cel 500 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 >>>14 Pacque Cel 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> >>>* 1st or tied for 1st >>> > >I think all the computer programs can be accomodated. The problem I think is 9 >rounds is overkill in a swiss when there are only 14 participants. If they had >played only 5 rounds, the top programs would probably have never been paired >with the bottom 2 finishers and the pairing problems you have alluded to would >never have occurred. If you look at the pairings actually made, none of the top >6 were paired with the bottom 2 until the 7th round. Oops! make that the top 4 rather than 6. > >If 5 rounds sounds too random, then just have them play 2 games with each other. >One as Black and one as White. This would also alleviate colour allocation >problems and now they would play a total of 10 games so the tournament result >would not be made more random. > >I don't like the idea of cutting out the weaker programs. I prefer a policy that >is encouraging and not exclusionary. > >>> >>>On August 25, 2000 at 20:33:58, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>On August 25, 2000 at 19:43:49, Peter McKenzie wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>No. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 Score SOP >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 1 Shredder x = 1 = = 1 = 1 1 1 7.0 48.0 >>>>> 2 Fritz = x = = = = 1 1 1 1 6.5 48.0 >>>>> 3 Chess Tiger 0 = x = = 1 1 = 1 1 6.0 37.5 >>>>> 4 Rebel = = x 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 6.0 37.5 >>>>> 5 Junior = = = 1 x = 0 = 1 1 5.5 44.5 >>>>> 6 SOS 0 = 1 = x 0 = 1 1 1 5.5 39.5 >>>>> 7 Nimzo = 0 = 0 1 1 x 0 1 1 5.0 49.5 >>>>> 8 Insomniac 0 0 0 = 1 x = 1 1 1 5.0 42.0 >>>>> 9 ZChess 0 0 = 0 x 1 0 1 1 1 4.5 36.0 >>>>> 10 Diep 0 0 0 = 0 x 1 = 1 1 4.0 36.0 >>>>> 11 Crafty 0 0 0 0 1 0 x = 1 1 3.5 35.5 >>>>> 12 Francesca = 0 0 0 0 = = x 1 1 3.5 35.5 >>>>> 13 XiniX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 1 1.0 38.0 >>>>> 14 Pacque Expert 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0.0 39.5 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Score SOP >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 1 Shredder W10+ B3+ W2= B4= W5= B7= W6+ B8+ W9+ 7.0 48.0 >>>>> 2 Fritz B8+ W7+ B1= W5= B4= W3= B9+ W6= B11+ 6.5 48.0 >>>>> 3 Chess Tiger B14+ W1- B12= W8+ B7= B2= W10+ B13+ W5= 6.0 37.5 >>>>> 4 Rebel B12+ W11+ B5- W1= W2= B6- B13+ W7+ W14+ 6.0 37.5 >>>>> 5 Junior W6= B10+ W4+ B2= B1= W9= W7- B14+ B3= 5.5 44.5 >>>>> 6 SOS B5= W8= B7- W12+ B14+ W4+ B1- B2= W13+ 5.5 39.5 >>>>> 7 Nimzo W9+ B2- W6+ B11+ W3= W1= B5+ B4- W8- 5.0 49.5 >>>>> 8 Insomniac W2- B6= W13+ B3- W10= B11+ W12+ W1- B7+ 5.0 42.0 >>>>> 9 ZChess B7- W14+ B11- B10+ W13+ B5= W2- W12+ B1- 4.5 36.0 >>>>> 10 Diep B1- W5- B14+ W9- B8= W13+ B3- W11+ B12= 4.0 36.0 >>>>> 11 Crafty W13+ B4- W9+ W7- B12= W8- B14+ B10- W2- 3.5 35.5 >>>>> 12 Francesca W4- B13+ W3= B6- W11= W14+ B8- B9- W10= 3.5 35.5 >>>>> 13 XiniX B11- W12- B8- W14+ B9- B10- W4- W3- B6- 1.0 38.0 >>>>> 14 Pacque Expert W3- B9- W10- B13- W6- B12- W11- W5- B4- 0.0 39.5 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No. Name Win Draw Loss Unf. Score Games % SOP >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> 1 Shredder +5 =4 -0 *0 7.0 9 77.8% 48.0 SUPER RESULT >>>>> 2 Fritz +4 =5 -0 *0 6.5 9 72.2% 48.0 SUPER RESULT >>>>> 3 Chess Tiger +4 =4 -1 *0 6.0 9 66.7% 37.5 SUPER RESULT >>>>> 4 Rebel +5 =2 -2 *0 6.0 9 66.7% 37.5 AVERAGE >>>>> 5 Junior +3 =5 -1 *0 5.5 9 61.1% 44.5 AVERAGE >>>>> 6 SOS +4 =3 -2 *0 5.5 9 61.1% 39.5 SUPER RESULT >>>>> 7 Nimzo +4 =2 -3 *0 5.0 9 55.6% 49.5 BAD RESULT >>>>> 8 Insomniac +4 =2 -3 *0 5.0 9 55.6% 42.0 UNUSUAL >>>>> 9 ZChess +4 =1 -4 *0 4.5 9 50.0% 36.0 GREAT RESULT >>>>> 10 Diep +3 =2 -4 *0 4.0 9 44.4% 36.0 MASTER >>>>> 11 Crafty +3 =1 -5 *0 3.5 9 38.9% 35.5 MASTER >>>>> 12 Francesca +2 =3 -4 *0 3.5 9 38.9% 35.5 MASTER >>>>> 13 XiniX +1 =0 -8 *0 1.0 9 11.1% 38.0 EXPERT LEVEL >>>>> 14 Pacque Expert +0 =0 -9 *0 0.0 9 0.0% 39.5 EXPERT LEVEL >>>>> >>>>>Total Games: 63 >>>>>White Wins: 26 (41.3%) >>>>>Black Wins: 20 (31.7%) >>>>>Draws: 17 (27.0%) >>>>>Unfinished: 0 (0.0%) >> >>I believe that programs that are not rated above 2500 should not be allowed >>toparticipate in the next WMCCC they just created havoc to the pairing of the >>top super programs. >> >>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.