Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:05:23 08/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 02:16:24, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On August 26, 2000 at 02:11:13, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On August 25, 2000 at 23:54:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On August 25, 2000 at 22:05:19, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>> PROGRAM CPU MHZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >>>>------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 1 Shredder K7 1000 *1 *2 *2½ *3 *3½ *4 *5 *6 *7 >>>> 2 Fritz PIII 1000 *1 *2 *2½ *3 *3½ *4 *5 5½ 6½ >>>> 3 Chess Tiger PIII 800 *1 1 1½ 2½ 3 3½ 4½ 5½ 6 >>>> 4 Rebel PIII 800 *1 *2 2 2½ 3 3 4 5 6 >>>> 5 Junior PIII 700 ½ 1½ *2½ *3 *3½ *4 4 5 5½ >>>> 6 SOS PIII 667 ½ 1 1 2 3 *4 4 4½ 5½ >>>> 7 Nimzo PIII 1000 *1 1 2 *3 *3½ *4 *5 5 5 >>>> 8 Incomniac PIII 933 0 ½ 1½ 1½ 2 3 4 4 5 >>>> 9 Zchess K7 800 0 1 1 2 3 3½ 3½ 4½ 4½ >>>>10 Diep PIII 800 0 0 1 1 1½ 2½ 2½ 3½ 4 >>>>11 Crafty Alpha 500 *1 1 2 2 2½ 2½ 3½ 3½ 3½ >>>>12 Francesca Cel 600 0 1 1½ 1½ 2 3 3 3 3½ >>>>13 XiniX Cel 500 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 >>>>14 Pacque Cel 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> >>>>* 1st or tied for 1st >>>> >> >>I think all the computer programs can be accomodated. The problem I think is 9 >>rounds is overkill in a swiss when there are only 14 participants. If they had >>played only 5 rounds, the top programs would probably have never been paired >>with the bottom 2 finishers and the pairing problems you have alluded to would >>never have occurred. If you look at the pairings actually made, none of the top >>6 were paired with the bottom 2 until the 7th round. > >Oops! make that the top 4 rather than 6. Wrong Tiger played against the weakest program in the first round. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.