Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Harakiri at Sight... corrected ratings

Author: Christian Pike

Date: 03:30:59 08/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


ok - here it is:

<pre>
             Tournament: world microcomputer chess championship
No.  Name                   ELO     Rc   Pts/G   We    Chg*10   Rp
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 1.FRITZ P3/1000,          2631    2545  6.5/9   5.58     9.2  2711
 2.REBEL P3/800,           2650    2492  5.0/8   5.68    -6.8  2587
 3.CHESSTIGER P3/800,      2573    2490  5.0/8   4.88     1.2  2585
 4.INSOMNIAC P3/933,       2477    2492  5.0/9   4.32     6.8  2535
 5.ZCHESS K7/800,          2400    2493  3.5/8   2.96     5.4  2450
 6.PACQUE EXPERT CEL/333,  1900    2473  0.0/9                 1474
 7.CRAFTY ALPHA21264/500,  2499    2466  2.5/8   4.40   -19.0  2325
 8.SOS P3/667,             2516    2506  4.5/8   4.08     4.2  2549
 9.SHREDDER K7/1000,       2640    2546  7.0/9   5.67    13.3  2766
10.DIEP P3/800,            2520    2461  3.0/8   4.64   -16.4  2374
11.XINIX CEL/500,          2100    2504  0.0/8   0.64    -6.4  1505
12.NIMZO P3/1000,          2549    2554  5.0/9   4.41     5.9  2597
13.JUNIOR P3/700,          2601    2560  4.5/8   4.48     0.2  2603
14.FRANCESCA CEL/600,      2400    2467  2.5/8   3.28    -7.8  2326
</pre>

chessbase:
2711+2603+2597 /3 = 2637

rebel:
2587+2585 /2 = 2586


millennium = 2766

so can i say that the chessbase programs have scored at least 129 rating
points weaker than the millennium-programs :-)))

and rebel products even 180 elo-points weaker ?!


have fun !




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.