Author: pavel
Date: 07:42:05 08/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 09:21:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 26, 2000 at 09:16:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I tried this position from the game century3-crafty17.11 >> >>[D]rnbqk2r/pp1p1ppp/4pn2/4P3/1b1N4/2N5/PPP2PPP/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 0 1 >> >>Crafty17.13 played 6...Qc7 >> >>I gave my Crafty17.11 as engine for Hiarcs with 128 Mbyes hash time control of 4 >>hours/60 moves >>(I guess that this time control is similiar to 2 hours/60 moves on the alpha) >> >>My Crafty17.11 changed its mind in the last second at depth 12 from 6..Qc7(0.15 >>pawn advantage) to the better move 6...Nd5(0.16 pawns advantage). >> >>I am interested to know crafty17.13's opinion. >>Can crafty17.13 avoid 6...Qc7 at depth 12? >> >>Uri > > >It avoids it by depth=10. The problem was that the mode we were using forced it >to play Qc7 as it was a book move. Somehow we followed a very rarely played >line, but until I get the log files from Graham I can't tell exactly why. I >did notice a pretty significant CAP score that might have pulled it down that >line erroneously... do you think adding the CAP score to crafty was a bad decision? or 'in other words' do you think it could have played better without them? thanks pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.