Author: pavel
Date: 08:19:37 08/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 11:07:51, walter irvin wrote: >On August 26, 2000 at 10:06:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 26, 2000 at 09:50:28, Randy Schmidt wrote: >> >>>Two questions: >>> >>>1. What was the version of Shredder playing and is it commercially available? >> >>Enrique said 4.22 >>> >>>2. What is the reason again for SSDF not listing Shredder? >> >>The reason is that the millenium did not let them to test other programs in the >>same package like Genius6.5 >> >>Uri > >i dont think the ssdf means as much as it used to .i think more weight should be >given to a tourn ,with more on the line in each game . negative... I think ratings system like SSDF is more reliable. I wish SSDF would be more *clean*, and give more priority to what the authors suggest, then what they think is right. IMO , I found the "reason" given by SSDF for not rating shredder, very stupid. pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.