Author: Amir Ban
Date: 10:47:47 08/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 06:30:59, Christian Pike wrote: >ok - here it is: > ><pre> > Tournament: world microcomputer chess championship >No. Name ELO Rc Pts/G We Chg*10 Rp >------------------------------------------------------------------- > 1.FRITZ P3/1000, 2631 2545 6.5/9 5.58 9.2 2711 > 2.REBEL P3/800, 2650 2492 5.0/8 5.68 -6.8 2587 > 3.CHESSTIGER P3/800, 2573 2490 5.0/8 4.88 1.2 2585 > 4.INSOMNIAC P3/933, 2477 2492 5.0/9 4.32 6.8 2535 > 5.ZCHESS K7/800, 2400 2493 3.5/8 2.96 5.4 2450 > 6.PACQUE EXPERT CEL/333, 1900 2473 0.0/9 1474 > 7.CRAFTY ALPHA21264/500, 2499 2466 2.5/8 4.40 -19.0 2325 > 8.SOS P3/667, 2516 2506 4.5/8 4.08 4.2 2549 > 9.SHREDDER K7/1000, 2640 2546 7.0/9 5.67 13.3 2766 >10.DIEP P3/800, 2520 2461 3.0/8 4.64 -16.4 2374 >11.XINIX CEL/500, 2100 2504 0.0/8 0.64 -6.4 1505 >12.NIMZO P3/1000, 2549 2554 5.0/9 4.41 5.9 2597 >13.JUNIOR P3/700, 2601 2560 4.5/8 4.48 0.2 2603 >14.FRANCESCA CEL/600, 2400 2467 2.5/8 3.28 -7.8 2326 ></pre> > >chessbase: >2711+2603+2597 /3 = 2637 > >rebel: >2587+2585 /2 = 2586 > > >millennium = 2766 > >so can i say that the chessbase programs have scored at least 129 rating >points weaker than the millennium-programs :-))) > >and rebel products even 180 elo-points weaker ?! > > >have fun ! What's the basis for the Rebel, Shredder and Insomniac rating ? Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.