Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:50:26 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2000 at 17:30:13, kurt wrote: >On August 26, 2000 at 13:56:02, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 26, 2000 at 13:46:15, kurt wrote: >> >>>On August 26, 2000 at 11:16:35, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On August 26, 2000 at 10:59:51, walter irvin wrote: >>>> >>>>> has an amatuer program ever one a world championship ? >>>> >>>>Yes >>>> >>>>Junior4.5 won the WMCCC in 1997 when it was amatuer. >>>> >>>> >>>> if programs like >>>>>fritz,rebel,tiger,hiarcs,junior,nimzo cant win a title anymore >>>> >>>> >>>>We do not know that they cannot win a title in the future. > >>>> >>>> .what chance does >>>>>programs like diep,crafty,sos,lg2000 ect. >>>> >>>> >>>>Diep and Sos and lg2000 are professional program. >>>>The last 2 are sold in the young talent package. >>>> >>>>Uri >><snipped> >>>I belief the difference between "Pro's" and "Amateurs" at this time, >>>is the human guidance / or interference to let engines >>>reach sound opening positions. >> >> >>I do not believe it. >> >>Shredder got a lost position out of the opening against nimzo and drew the game. >> >>Uri >>You missed my point. Lets look at position move 18.Nh2 >>An engine would not reach such a position. >>White burned all bridges to attack Blacks King. >>This is human guidance and not engine knowledgeBase. >>Tactical analysis my require more than 20 ply search to >>reach a conclusion for this position to clear. >>Therefore an engine should not be left in such a >>position if its Search capability is inadaquate. Shredder is professional program and it was left in this position with black so the point is that I do not see that the human guide for shredder in this game. I believe that the main difference between pro's and amatuers is the fact that the pro's have better engines. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.