Author: Martin Hasse
Date: 04:43:38 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 06:24:03, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >When I look at all the WMCCC games I can see that: > >1. Shredder was dead lost against REBEL right after the opening. >2. Shredder was even more lost against NIMZO right after the opening. >3. Shredder had nothing to speak of against FRITZ and JUNIOR, bot as WHITE. >4. Your anti Caro Kann wasn't much liked by Shredder, since it had a negative >evaluation against ZCHESS.... > >So I will even count 5 unlucky openings out of 9, not a very good score... >The reason because of which Shredder won the WMCCC was its fighting spirit, its >excellent program and fighting skills. Based on the bad opening lines it had in >this championship it is amazing that Shredder won! > >Jeroen Wer im Glashaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen schmeißen! There we have it again. One idle opening-expert fires a rocket ( ~ "your performance was miserable!") to another one. I would have liked it much more, when rebel/rebel-tiger would have come out of opening as good as the kure prepared programs did. Why do you critisize sandro when rebel/rebel-tiger was not much better at this championship - jeroen. i don't get this. what is this ? Ablenkung von eigenen Fehlern ? please enlighten me. otherwise i sum up rebel/rebel-tigers opening-statistic at this championship. :-)) please - could you (that we can discuss better) post all rebel/rebel-tiger games from this championship WITH comment WHERE the programs had to compute first. that would be a good help to discuss the topic from rebels point of view. thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.