Author: Martin Hasse
Date: 04:48:35 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 06:55:13, Uri Blass wrote: >I agree that Shredder did not choose good lines objectively but it is also >important to choose lines that you know how to play and it is possible that with >different lines Shredder could get better position out of book but get worse >results. >I guess that it is what Wolfgang suggests. you should never forget that it is not important with WHICH evaluation a program leaves book. it is important what it can make against opponent A out of the position. i have seen many programs leave book with a minus score but play pretty well against opponent A in that line. i would call such an opening a GOOD line when it results in a win by good play. >I think that it was better for Shredder if he said nothing because the result of >Shredder was impressive and it suggests that shredder is the best program to >buy(ignoring opening books) because it got the first place inspite of bad book >lines. correct ! but we discuss shredders book-performance. what about rebel/rebel-tigers opening-book performance? >If wolfgang is right then it suggests that probably the Shredder engine is not >better than Fritz and Shredder won because of better opening preperation (book >that helped shredder to get positions that it knows to play). difficult sentence of yours , i don#t understand the meaning. could you make it clearer ?! >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.