Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 05:16:18 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 07:43:38, Martin Hasse wrote: You forget one thing, which is very important: The reason I wrote about the bad lines of Shredder, was because the opening book author claimed that his book is MUCH BETTER then ANY of the other books. When you score 5 bad lines this makes a very odd impression to me, I find it rather strange to claim this! I will NEVER say that my book is the best. I don't like such statements at all. Especially when the facts prove the contrary. Anyway, I like Alex Kure's books most of all, but that must have been know to you! Regards, Jeroen NB I am only partly happy with the book lines in WMCCC for TIGER and REBEL. I worked for 3 months to prepare, some lines went well, others didn't because I didn't expect them. It proves one thing: You NEVER can be 100% sure. But it is a problem for all programs, since every program had at least one bad line. >Wer im Glashaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen schmeißen! > >There we have it again. One idle opening-expert fires a rocket >( ~ "your performance was miserable!") >to another one. > >I would have liked it much more, when rebel/rebel-tiger would have >come out of opening as good as the kure prepared programs did. > >Why do you critisize sandro when rebel/rebel-tiger was not much >better at this championship - jeroen. i don't get this. > >what is this ? >Ablenkung von eigenen Fehlern ? > >please enlighten me. > >otherwise i sum up rebel/rebel-tigers opening-statistic at this championship. > >:-)) > >please - could you (that we can discuss better) post >all rebel/rebel-tiger games from this championship WITH comment >WHERE the programs had to compute first. >that would be a good help to discuss the topic from rebels point of view. > >thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.