Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:48:33 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 08:33:18, Sandro Necchi wrote: >Well, 9 games really means nothing. I think to have an idea of a program and of >a book one needs to see at least 300 games. >So, what I say is based on what I know, not from the MWC. >Anyway I can give you some pictures of the improvements based on test games at >40/2 time control level, during the developing phase, this means that now we >would do better. > >Shredder 4x - Hiarcs 7.32 = 16 - 4! no losses >Shredder 4x - Rebel Tiger 12 = 12.5 - 2.5 >Shredder 4x - Fritz 6a = 17 - 8 >Shredder 4x - Junior 6a = 23.5 - 13.5 > >but I AM NOT SATISFIED YET!! > >Ciao > >Sandro The question is if the good results are because of better book or because of the engine. Even if I assume that they are by better book it does not prove that the book of shredder was better than the opponents because the opponents had also better book in WMCCC. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.