Author: Martin Hasse
Date: 06:29:13 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 08:16:18, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >When you score 5 bad lines this makes a very odd impression to me, I find it >rather strange to claim this! I will NEVER say that my book is the best. I don't >like such statements at all. Especially when the facts prove the contrary. >Anyway, I like Alex Kure's books most of all, but that must have been know to >you! Yes - i don't like idle opening-experts. they forget that they are in charge for the whole team. when idle "i can it better than you" stops a program from winning games, than the whole team is in danger. therefore i would like to talk about the openings played at championships. can you please post rebel/rebel-tiger games with the point tiger/rebel and opponent left the game, if you know about this ? i don't have this kind of information. i do only have the games but NOT the point when they left book. but this is very much important to discuss about openings, as you know. you would do me a favour, even if this gives me material to critisize you. but - as a man - i guess you can stand it. >Regards, Jeroen >NB I am only partly happy with the book lines in WMCCC for TIGER and REBEL. thought so. there were good and bad games, i remember. > I >worked for 3 months to prepare, some lines went well, others didn't because I >didn't expect them. It proves one thing: You NEVER can be 100% sure. of course. i therefore prefer SHORT not human-theory lines. you have the control and the position is balanced. >But it is a >problem for all programs, since every program had at least one bad line. right.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.