Author: Alexander Kure
Date: 08:11:23 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 08:52:20, Sandro Necchi wrote: >Uri, I am not sure about other books because I only know mine. > >I think my book is the best because it is not just a collection of human games >and scores percentages as other do, but it includes a lot of my own ideas and >tests. The same is true for Jeroen's and my book! So I don't get it why your book should be best. You have no evident facts to proove this point. I have been to London and had a close look at all of the participant's opening preparation. I liked Jeroen's preperation a lot, but i was not impressed by Shredder's preperation. Against his contenders for the title he chose to play harmless lines with white (e.g. against Fritz and Junior) and only against non contenders for the title he tried to play for the advantage in the opening. It was quite amusing to see Stefan and Ossi watching the game Nimzo - Shredder as Shredder was falling into the opening i prepared for him. We even joked about Shredder's bad opening preparation for the WMCCC ;-) They did not dare to reveal that you had prepared the book. > >However I think the Shredder engine is the best!! > >The only thing is that at these levels the opening books are becoming more and >more important. > Right! It is not enough to repeat opening lines as they are being played in human tournaments but you must also incorporate all the analysis (i.e. moves that have never been played) to stabalize the lines you are playing. In the game Nimzo vs. Shredder this was not the case for the Shredder book. Greetings Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.