Author: Detlef Pordzik
Date: 09:59:13 08/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2000 at 11:36:18, Sandro Necchi wrote: >Well, maybe I have been missunderstood. > >I did not say that the previous book was a bad one. If I did in anyway I really >did not mean this. > >The previous book, according to my opinion, was quite impressive, but together >with good lines includes also weaker lines or weaker for the program as it plays >well some lines and does not for other. >So what I do is a sort of optimization, but by saying that I like my book more >that other I do not mean that other people do bad things. > >I hope you understand what I mean. > >Sorry for the missunderstanding I don't like to criticized other people and if I >do it is not done on purpose. > >Sandro Necchi Allright Sandro, this was a clear word and I fully accept it. From my side I wish you all the very best + down to the bone for your important work on this great product, you now support. ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.