Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:10:27 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2000 at 06:28:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 28, 2000 at 06:02:23, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >>>>>>>Which program is best in playing human players? Shredder 5.0 >>>>> >>>>>no, no, no. much better is rebel. >>> >>>Oh? How was this determined? I agree Rebel is great at playing against human >>>opponents, but 'much better'? I recall that Shredder's results in the Israeli >>>leagues were not too bad. >> >>have you ever seen rebel was beaten in a human-comp comparison by another >>program in the last years? >>neither in israel, nor at the aegon tournament. > >The aegon tournament was a long time ago so I cannot count it today. > >Rebel did the best result in Israel against humans but you can blame the >operator of shredder for this fact. > >If you compare Junior's results in dortmund with other results you can see that >Junior did the best results so the picture is not clear. > >Rebel may be the best against humans but I am not sure about it. > >The meaning of being the best against humans is also not clear because it is >possible that one program is best in winning weak players when another program >is best in playing against strong players. > >>have you played yourself many programs? >>i can say, that i sometimes can survive against tiger, seldom shredder and >>fritz, but i have not a single draw against rebel. only losses! > >It proves that Rebel is the best against you but it does not prove that Rebel is >the best against humans. > >Uri I think you are missing an important point. Have you ever seen Rebel strangled in the last 25-30 GM games as we have seen in the dutch championship and at Dortmund? Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.