Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:32:27 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2000 at 06:36:31, Christian Pike wrote: >On August 27, 2000 at 10:28:09, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On August 27, 2000 at 09:31:26, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>>Noomen is simply umbelievable >>> >>>Jeroen is a good book specialist and a fine person. Can we leave personal >>>attacks out of all this. >>> >>>Enrique >> >> >>Thanks Enrique. I am going to leave this thread now, as I don't want to be >>involved in such discussions. It makes me sick and I think I will not be in CCC >>for some time. I can use my time better. Sorry! >> >>Jeroen > >instead of retiring , leaving or giving up computerchess >it would be helpful to discuss about the contents, this means: >show us the games, and the point where shredder / rebel / rebel-tiger left >the book. > >THEN we can analyze ! In this tournament the book(s) played a dominant role much more than in the other world championships of the last years. The Belgrade gambit for Tiger with 6.Bc4 was refuted by the Nf6 novelty. Based on that for Rebel 6.Qe2 was tried against Shredder and with success. In general I was pleased with the Rebel book choices except against Fritz and SOS. Against Fritz Rebel with white had no advantage as it should be playing with white. In the SOS game Rebel was faced with a position it did not understand. My opening choice against Junior playing the sicilian was a bad one as I should have known better but after the 2 good victories in the first 2 rounds I got a bit overconfident. All in all it was not so bad neither was it optimal. My experience with these tournaments is that you can prepare what you want but only in exceptional cases (10%) you get on the board what you had in mind. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.