Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 06:37:26 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
>>>A good book is not a book that leads you to better positions but a book that >>>lead you to better result. >> >>i have the same opinion, but against nimzo and rebel the book leaded into a >>loss. > >Practically it leaded to a draw. >Shredder did not lose these games. it only led to a draw because shredders opponents played VERY weak moves in the late stage. let play shredder against himself and you will see no rescue. it can´t be a good choice to reach a lost position, hoping your opponent will blunder. that´s not a good book. >>who was more worse? > >I think that Crafty was worse. >Crafty really lost against Rebel and Nimzo because of bad book lines. yes, you are right! craftys book was so worse that one have no words for that. > >I believe that in the crafty case the shredder engine could not help after Qc7. > >>>I was impressed by the way that Junior played the middle game against >>>Shredder,Rebel and tiger. >> >>yes, but did you forget the games against sos and diep and zchess? > >The game against Diep seems to be a bad opening choice and the others? >Can other programs get better results against Diep from the same opening? i do not know. not tested. >>>Junior was the most interesting program in the event. >> >>i do not think so. > >I think it was the most interesting not in the meaning that it was the best but >in the meaning that it played some games in a different way than other programs. i understand. yes, junior has shown a nice attacking-style. no doubt. > >> >>>I think that this program did the biggest change relative to previous versions. >> >>no. it was rebel or shredder, maybe tiger. no doubt for me. > >I did not say the biggest change in rating and I meant the biggest change in the >choice of moves. i understand. marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.