Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Questions to be answered in the WMCCC.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 09:11:30 08/28/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 28, 2000 at 10:23:53, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:

>On August 28, 2000 at 10:11:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>Oh well, Amir will face a real big problem then. He searched
>>this championship 17 ply. He searched also 17 ply at a quad xeon in
>>paderborn. So obviously he has not slowed down Junior.
>>
>>Obviously Junior is a big preprocessor still,
>
>Junior counts in half plies, so a 17 ply in Junior is the equivalent of a
>conventional 9 plies.
>
>Enrique


I don't think it is quite that easy to translate junior plies -> normal plies.
IE in "our" way of counting, the recapture stuff doesn't influence anything.
In Junior's way, it does.  I think that even though he counts half-plies, his
search of (say) 18 half-plies is better than a normal search of 9 plies.

Otherwise he would get killed with a 9 ply search.

I also think that comparing 9 plies to 9 plies is problematic, of course,
since different searches make better or worse use of those 9 plies.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.