Author: Chessfun
Date: 16:02:34 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2000 at 18:49:21, robert blackwell wrote: >I am rather shocked at uri blass. This is not something i would expect from >someone who seems like a expert in the field of computer chess. All i was >stating was my findings and that others should try and see for them self!!. >Though it does seem that others share my opinion. I need not spend 2 hours post >games just to have no one look at them, or get side tracked. I am not claiming a >verdict. Only results from what some may take as a few games. Good Day. Some >advice uri! Try it your self. For it seems you need proof, well lad seeing is >believing. :> Without stating your computer/s and setup info or posting the pgn's which takes very little time and effort, there are no findings. The SSDF have tested both programs as have endless others including myself. While it is possible in any series of games two programs can have results such as you originally posted, without the information stated above they are very meaningless. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.