Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:01:51 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2000 at 23:45:36, Will Singleton wrote: >On August 28, 2000 at 16:12:17, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>There have been a few delays because of: >>1. I went on vacation >>2. I had jury duty >>3. I got sick. > >I can understand the others, but jury duty? That took precedence over the >Battle? Hope someone isn't getting burned out. :) <OT> Only on Jury duty for 2 days. Never got selected for a jury, but had one close call (the prosecutor and defense attorney were both fine with me, but the defendant went into a panicky lather and started chatting really excitedly with his attorney, so I got left off of that jury.). I got paid TWENTY DOLLARS FOR JURY DUTY!!! That's right! Ten dollars per day. No wonder so many people are clamoring to do it. We also got to watch a movie about the judicial process. Did you know that juries *NEVER* make the wrong decision? At least that's what one judge said. </OT> >>We are about 2/3 of the way through round 5. >>Anyway, here is the current result summary: >> >> >> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws >> >> 1 LGoliath : 16.5/ 20 82.5 2248 2517 123 185 25.0 % >> 2 Crafty : 14.0/ 20 70.0 2297 2444 138 123 40.0 % >> 3 AnMon : 13.0/ 20 65.0 2253 2361 145 140 30.0 % >> 4 Amy : 11.0/ 20 55.0 2279 2314 162 127 30.0 % >> 5 Gromit3 : 10.0/ 20 50.0 2256 2256 152 152 20.0 % >> 6 TCBishop : 8.0/ 16 50.0 2318 2318 151 151 37.5 % >> 7 Bringer : 9.5/ 20 47.5 2372 2355 116 167 35.0 % >> 8 Comet : 9.5/ 20 47.5 2283 2266 88 167 55.0 % >> 9 Gromit2 : 9.0/ 20 45.0 2304 2269 127 162 30.0 % >> 10 Phalanx : 9.0/ 20 45.0 2236 2201 127 162 30.0 % >> 11 Francesca : 6.5/ 16 40.6 2331 2265 205 179 6.2 % >> 12 SOS : 8.0/ 20 40.0 2357 2287 115 153 40.0 % >> 13 Yace : 7.0/ 20 35.0 2324 2216 99 145 50.0 % >> 14 ZChess : 5.0/ 20 25.0 2318 2127 185 131 20.0 % >> > >I'm surprised by Bringer and Yace. Wouldn't expect Bringer to be above Phalanx >and Comet. And what's Yace doing down there? And Zchess? That's one tough >group, I guess. It's early, and the pairings have been rather uneven so far. But who's Yace going to climb over? I think "it's a tough crowd" pretty well sums it up all right. >> >> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws >> >> 1 ExChess : 13.5/ 16 84.4 2242 2535 142 311 6.2 % >> 2 Ant : 12.0/ 16 75.0 2150 2341 154 233 12.5 % >> 3 ArasanX : 12.0/ 16 75.0 2300 2491 154 233 12.5 % >> 4 lambChop : 10.5/ 16 65.6 2276 2388 168 155 31.2 % >> 5 Knightx : 13.0/ 20 65.0 2320 2428 145 214 0.0 % >> 6 InmiChess3 : 9.5/ 15 63.3 2179 2274 180 185 20.0 % >> 7 GNUChess4 : 10.0/ 16 62.5 2212 2300 173 165 25.0 % >> 8 LDBlanche : 5.0/ 19 26.3 2353 2174 183 138 21.1 % >> 9 Dragon : 4.0/ 16 25.0 2435 2244 289 154 0.0 % >> 10 Fortress : 3.5/ 16 21.9 2365 2144 274 150 6.2 % >> 11 Amyan : 3.0/ 16 18.8 2383 2128 202 146 25.0 % >> 12 gnuchess : 3.0/ 16 18.8 2397 2143 258 146 12.5 % >> > >EXchess and Inmichess are doing better than I expected, and Lambchop a bit >worse. Maybe I should get someone to port my code to Windows. I think InmiChess will do even better. I'm not surprised by ExChess at all. I'm using the VC++ 6.0 build, which is a lot stronger than the one on Dan Homan's site for the machines I am using anyway. I suspect that most of the games you see are from that build or a GCC Linux build. UNIX programs are a breeze to port to Winboard (and if they are Xboard programs, it is often a 30 minute job or less). From what I have seen, Mac programs will be a cuss to port. >> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws >> >> 1 Averno : 12.5/ 16 78.1 2192 2413 150 274 6.2 % >> 2 Cilian : 15.5/ 20 77.5 2302 2517 128 248 5.0 % >> 3 Sjeng73 : 15.5/ 20 77.5 2196 2411 128 175 25.0 % >> 4 Freyr : 10.0/ 16 62.5 2255 2344 173 196 12.5 % >> 5 SSEchess : 11.5/ 20 57.5 2292 2344 157 138 25.0 % >> 6 Faile : 9.0/ 16 56.2 2396 2439 185 182 12.5 % >> 7 Gully2 : 11.0/ 20 55.0 2264 2299 162 144 20.0 % >> 8 ColChess : 9.5/ 20 47.5 2302 2285 132 167 25.0 % >> 9 DChess : 5.0/ 16 31.2 2385 2248 258 163 0.0 % >> 10 NewRival : 3.0/ 16 18.8 2370 2115 202 146 25.0 % >> 11 Chessterfield: 3.5/ 20 17.5 2378 2108 185 123 25.0 % >> 12 Crux : 2.0/ 16 12.5 2373 2035 289 139 12.5 % >> >> >> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws >> >> 1 TSCP : 13.0/ 16 81.2 2167 2422 146 258 12.5 % >> 2 LarsenVB : 13.5/ 20 67.5 2368 2495 141 132 35.0 % >> 3 Monik : 12.5/ 20 62.5 2339 2428 149 168 15.0 % >> 4 Storm : 12.0/ 20 60.0 2409 2479 153 133 30.0 % >> 5 Ozwald : 9.0/ 16 56.2 2322 2365 185 155 25.0 % >> 6 Noonian : 11.0/ 20 55.0 2344 2379 162 95 50.0 % >> 7 Zephyr : 8.5/ 16 53.1 2244 2265 191 163 18.8 % >> 8 SnailSCP : 9.0/ 20 45.0 2273 2239 127 162 30.0 % >> 9 Raffaela : 2.5/ 16 15.6 2361 2068 239 142 18.8 % >> 10 Golem01 : 1.0/ 20 5.0 2356 1845 327 88 10.0 % > >All in all, this is pretty interesting. I like the format, particularly since >it is a continuing deal, and other progs can be added as they appear. I assume. Any new programs will have to wait until the next iteration. Probably two months off at least.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.