Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 22:33:16 08/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2000 at 01:20:42, Uri Blass wrote: >I have not Junior6 and Fritz6 but other people have and they can check the >games. > >The problem is that the result seems illogical based on all the previous >results of Junior6 and Junior5 that I know. Yes. >It seems that there is something wrong in the results and it is a bad idea to >post results like this without data of games(The result of Junior5 against >Junior6 proves with more than 99% security that Junior5 is better than Junior6 >when normal result show that Junior6 is better than Junior5 except maybe very >fast games when Junior6a lose often on time but these very fast games are not >relevant here because the poster posted time control of 1 hour/game and not 1 >minute/game). > >I do not say that the posters are liars but I am sure that the first thought of >many people when they read posts that Junior5 is clearly better than Junior6 >without data about the games is that the posters are liars. No, that I seriously doubt. Assuming that other people lie because their perception of the world is different is basically wrong and unworthy. >This is the reason that it is a bad idea to post information like this without >data. I have no problem with your repsonse to the original message in this thread aking for data as there was a lack of it, but your subsequent replies to David could have been handled with a little tact and respect. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.