Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:33:25 08/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2000 at 02:51:25, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>>i disagree. rebel can outplay shredder in the endgame regularely. >>>and rebel can defend an endgame very well, if it is defendable. >>>the difference is: shredder is able to hold totally lost positions. he is the >>>best "swindler". >>> >>>no other program has this ability. >>> >>>in "normal" endgames tiger and rebel are more than competitable. >> >>I don't understand. If it is "totally lost" it is even harder to hold the draw, >>isn't it? >> > >of course. and that is shredder´s advantage. he is able to swindle in unequal >positions as good as nobody else. > >but let him play against rebel and tiger out of equal endgame positions. nothing >to swindle, only to play. here he comes much more into trouble than the others. > >marcus Did you test the version that played in WCCC to find that it comes into trouble against Rebel and tiger in equal endgame positions? Did you test it at long time control eqvivalent to the time control on WCCC? My impression based on the games that I saw(WCCC and the games of Enrique against Fritz6b and Junior6a) is different. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.