Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:40:02 08/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2000 at 15:22:12, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >On August 29, 2000 at 07:14:19, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 29, 2000 at 06:09:05, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >> >>>>what does having "chessbase support behind" has to do with winning a WMCC event? >>> >>>most professional preparation. this is worth 100 elo in a tournament. >> >>Chessbase does not do more professional preperation than other companies. >> >>Uri > >sorry uri, but this is wrong. >have you been at the last wcc´s? >i haven´t seen you. > >and as a member of the rebel team this year and shredder team last year, i know >what we have done and if i compare with chessbase then i know this is nothing. > >marcus Sorry, but you said that the reason that you expected chessbase not to win is also the fact that the operators of other programs can force luck better. Based on ssdf games of shredder4 I believe that Shredder was not the best software+hardware in the last WCCC but you predicted that it is going to win and you were right. The only logical reason for it is the fact that you knew that it does better opening preperation. Operators can force luck only by better choice of the opening. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.