Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight.

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 01:54:38 08/30/00

Go up one level in this thread

On August 30, 2000 at 04:35:32, Christian Pike wrote:

>>If he did it 2-3 years ago, why not?
>>But does this mean that Fritz has caught up with CSTAL but more sound at the
>>same time? (no comparison, of course - when beauty and truth agree).
>>S.Taylor
>
>of course chris was earlier. but i don`t see
>that cstal on 1 gigaherz cpu would be less sound.
>
>i don`t see that h4 was brilliant. white should not take
>on c5 and thats all.
>CSTal would NOT sac in this position and it would also not eat the knight.

Cstal is wrong because eating the knight is good for white.
20.bxc5 dxc5 21.Nxe6 is good for white.

Uri

• Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Christian Pike 03:24:22 08/30/00
  • Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Uri Blass 03:48:00 08/30/00
    • Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Alexander Kure 05:02:24 08/30/00
      • Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Tim Mirabile 06:45:01 08/30/00
        • Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Uri Blass 07:09:38 08/30/00
          • Re: Fritz Has A NO Weapon, you don`t have to eat the knight. Uri Blass 07:53:18 08/30/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.