Author: Imran Hendley
Date: 14:05:44 08/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2000 at 16:02:40, Daniel Chancey wrote: >CM6666 was proven that it was not the strongest. The personality had some bad >tournaments and didn't win Group B of the Chessmaster Open. > >Castle2000 Yeah, I've noticed that it's weaker at blitz, but fairly strong at longer time controls. Because all Chessmaster personalities you use are very close in strength, a tournament of so few games as you play leaves the winner up to chance. So why not throw in some more personalities just for the heck of it? You're never gonna find the best one.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.