Author: Didzis Cirulis
Date: 05:32:14 09/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2000 at 08:16:37, Didzis Cirulis wrote: >On September 01, 2000 at 07:19:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On September 01, 2000 at 02:40:48, C McClain Morris, Jr. wrote: >> >>>I contacted Steve Lopez and he is unaware of any Fritz 6b. >> >>Fritz 6a, 289280 bytes, 23-1-2000 >>Fritz 6b, 290816 bytes, 10-4-2000 >> >>It seems that Fritz 6a has some tablebase bugs, corrected in F6b. Aside from >>this, I seldom notice differences between 6a and 6b. There are exceptions, like >>this position: >> >>r1bqk2r/pppp1Npp/8/2bnP3/8/6K1/PB4PP/RN1Q3R b kq - 0 12; bm e8g8; >> >>On a P600E with 184MB hashtables, F6b finds 0-0 in 93 seconds, and F6a in 292. >> >>Enrique > >As far as I see, there IS some difference. The first test match against F5.32, >5min/game, 12 games, was won by F6b impressively = 9.5-2.5. Under the same >conditions F6a got 6-6. > >The second match was a Gountlet. Again 5min/game. F6b won every opponent >convincingly. The best result for opponents was that of Hiarcs 7.32, which lost >by 2.5 vs 3.5 points of Fritz. Others were simply killed. > >The third match is in progress. 60min/game. Gountlet. Opponents are Hiarcs 7.32, >Junior 6a, Crafty 17.11 (Chessbase) and Fritz 5.32. There will be 24 games >total. Game 3 in progress and Fritz is +1.50. Both previous games were won by >Fritz 6b. > >Conditions: I use the Light.ctg which comes with F6 demo. The reason is that I >want to see engines thinking instead of coming out of book at move 30. No >tablebases used this time. > >Didzis Cirulis Hardware: Celeron 500. Hashtable size: 16 MB for each engine When I observed that those blitz games, it seemed to me that fritz's engame has improved. I know that some games mean nothing ;-) Maybe that is the same F6a, who is just happy about the improved interface..... Didzis
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.