Author: Ernst A. Heinz
Date: 13:39:27 09/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Peter, >>"DarkThought WCCC'99" behaves similarly (fail low in iteration 13 >>with horrible branching factor) but searches much fewer nodes >>overall (roughly 70% less). > >Interesting that for depth 11 our scores practically agreed but I used much less >nodes than you. Then my search went really crazy! > >My hash table was only 10mb, not sure if this had much impact. >I'm planning on running this again on a computer at work to see how it goes with >a bigger hash table. My remark was only an observation and not meant to imply that our search outperformed yours -- sorry, if it sounded this way. :-( I tested with 64MB transposition tables and somehow overlooked that "LambChop" searched fewer nodes per iteration up to depth 11. I probably misread your 1.7 million nodes as 17 million ... >BTW, I ordered your book last week, looking forward to reading it! Please enjoy! BTW, I am really curious how long delivery of the book takes in Australia / New Zealand. Cheers, =Ernst=
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.