Author: Uwe Immel
Date: 12:59:32 12/07/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 1997 at 08:58:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>I think, 30 minutes/move is a good compromise for the time controls. >>It’s enough time for the machines to avoid blunders and should be >>leading >>to demanding games. >>Playing by email should be the easiest way, also it would be a good >>thing >>to post the current standings of the games regular in CCC. >> >>Uwe > >I have to save the wishes of my programs ! :-) >With 30 Minutes per move my Mephisto III S would have a difficult stand >against Mach III. Mephi would have a difficult stand at every time control against Mach III, he’s tuned up to 18 mhz ;-) >Maybe we can do this individually. Let’s try to select an well-balanced group of participants, so there is no need for Mach III to take part in, for the same reason I count rexchess into the #new generation group# of programs, in spite of it’s from 1989. But I’m very interested to see how Kaplans D++ is doing !, it should participate ! >And if we post here, we shold not post any move, or ? >Maybe any fith move. Yup, or in interesting/crucial positions
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.