Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:33:09 09/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2000 at 10:13:45, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 04, 2000 at 09:29:12, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Wonderful! I think one can use common sense, intuition and discretion to realize >>what this is indicating! > >After using all of the above I haven't got a clue. > >> So Fritz 6b at London was probably not at its best. So Shredder 5 is not such >>a big catch, as Fritz 6a would have probably held it back. > >Fritz 6b has nothing to do with the London version as it's supposedly an update >to 6a, while it was probably a betarelease of Fritz 7 participating in London. >How can you draw conclusions from old service packs to results at WMCCC? > >There's no reason to believe that Shredder 5 (or 4.xx) isn't a big catch. > >Mogens. So 6b came long before London version? Isn't Shredder only better in later middlegame/endgame? Chessfun also answered me about 6b and AFAIK in a sister subthread. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.