Author: stuart taylor
Date: 00:09:28 09/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2000 at 03:00:39, Tony Werten wrote: >On September 05, 2000 at 02:28:09, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>After 9 rounds, we had commercial programs at place 1-7 and free/amateur engines >>at place 8-14! So may be only real conclusion after London is, that amateurs are >>amateurs and pros are pros... > >I noticed it when playing. There are very big differences, specially in the >finetuning of the eval and the openingbook. > >These take so much time, that it's almost impossible for an amateur to keep up. > >You can even see the splitup among the amateurs, amateurs working solo and the >ones working with more people ( or at least having a professionel book, tester). > >Tony > >> >>Jouni A related question, Are there amateur programs which are more profound and intrinsically qualitative (besides the fact they they lose, for reasons of certain types of imperfections)than any of the proffesional comercial programs? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.