Author: Tony Werten
Date: 01:32:47 09/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2000 at 03:09:28, stuart taylor wrote: >On September 05, 2000 at 03:00:39, Tony Werten wrote: > >>On September 05, 2000 at 02:28:09, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>After 9 rounds, we had commercial programs at place 1-7 and free/amateur engines >>>at place 8-14! So may be only real conclusion after London is, that amateurs are >>>amateurs and pros are pros... >> >>I noticed it when playing. There are very big differences, specially in the >>finetuning of the eval and the openingbook. >> >>These take so much time, that it's almost impossible for an amateur to keep up. >> >>You can even see the splitup among the amateurs, amateurs working solo and the >>ones working with more people ( or at least having a professionel book, tester). >> >>Tony >> >>> >>>Jouni >A related question, Are there amateur programs which are more profound and >intrinsically qualitative (besides the fact they they lose, for reasons of >certain types of imperfections)than any of the proffesional comercial programs? Maybe, if I could understand the question. Could you please rewrite it for non-native english speakers ? Tony >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.