Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Games from Ohio Chess Congress

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 19:26:32 09/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2000 at 22:10:38, Uri Blass wrote:

>Here is the correct pgn(there were some errors but by inteligence it is easy to
>find the right moves).
>I guess that the programs of today cannot understand this pgn and cannot pass
>the turing test in reading the pgn and correcting the errors.
>
>I do not know the reason that my computer writes $2 instead of my ? but I did
>not change it in the pgn.
>
>I did not give ? in the last games.
>
>18...Qb6 was a mistake in the last game and 18...Bb4 with a clear advantage for
>black was better(19.Nef3 Bxf3 and black wins material).
>
>19...Bb4 was another mistake and Qb4 was better.

It is not clear.
longer analysis of Junior suggest 19...Qb4 because 19...Bb4 20.gxh5 is good for
white.

20...Nxd7 was clearly wrong and better was 20..Qc6 21 when black has practical
chances but white wins material.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.