Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 05:49:11 09/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
>Please, solve this position and say how much difference your hash table did. > >Indicate any parameter of your search that you consider important. > >It is pretty normal position from the book. > [D]kb6/B3P3/K1P5/p7/P7/3r4//8/8 w - - > >My solver could not resolve it by selective search and went paintful 24 sec (AMD >400) before finding the mate. Mine have no hash tables. When I went to see it on >Rebel 10, I was impressed. His time in solving the position knew around 6 fold >improvement between solution without hash and with it. His hash was 28 M. > [D]q1bkb1q1/2nqn3/1BrnrB2/1R1Q1R2/1NNQNN2/2Q1Q3/2QQQ3/3K4 w - - > >This last, is the fantasy position. Did it yesterday. Also could not solve it at >minimum number of moves by selective search. It took lengthy 18.5 min to reach >minimum number of moves for mate by brute force. Selective search can reach it >only if one move more is permitted. Then it take it in 2 sec. But how much hash >table could help in this position? > >Thanks, >Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.