Author: William Bryant
Date: 19:17:55 09/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2000 at 22:10:13, William Bryant wrote: >On September 06, 2000 at 07:34:48, leonid wrote: > >>Hello! >> >>Please, solve this position and say how much difference your hash table did. >> >>Indicate any parameter of your search that you consider important. >> >>It is pretty normal position from the book. >> >> kb6/B3P3/K1P5/p7/P7/3r4//8/8 w >> >>My solver could not resolve it by selective search and went paintful 24 sec (AMD >>400) before finding the mate. Mine have no hash tables. When I went to see it on >>Rebel 10, I was impressed. His time in solving the position knew around 6 fold >>improvement between solution without hash and with it. His hash was 28 M. >> > >Screamer solves this one instantly (in debug mode running in background) > >Welcome to Screamer 1.00 Build 55 >Current Hash Table Size: 16384 K bytes >Current Pawn Hash Size: 4096 K bytes >Debug Control On >PVS Search >NULL move Search >Opening Book loaded and enabled >3 and 4 Piece Table Bases enabled >1490 kb of Ram used for decompression tables >1024 kb of Ram used for EGTB buffers > >New Board Position >kb6/B3P3/K1P5/p7/P7/3r4//8/8 w >Move 1 W>> >The Current Search Time: 60 seconds >Trying Book Move >PLY NODES TIME SCORE PV >__________________________________________________ > 5/00 8601 0.249 ++ > 5/00 13767 0.478 +327.38 e8=Q Rb3 Qxb8+ Rxb8 Bxb8 Kxb8 6/00 30415 0.638 +327.58 e8=Q Rb3 Qd7 Rb6+ Bxb6 Bc7 Qc8+ Bb8 Qb7++ (left a line off sorry). > >William >wbryant@ix.netcom.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.