Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:49:10 09/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2000 at 18:40:49, Marc van Hal wrote: >Why do I always get someone on my back or get neglacted >When I talk about my work >And why do I have to prove my self over and over again that my work was not >generated only by computerprograms >and even that games wich where played by top GM's origenaly where my anelyzes >(the prove is here just search out all my posting and you shall see I am right I believe that more people would download your data if you wrote it in a way that programs can understand. It is possible to save analysis with one of the Fritz engines and I believe that posting the analysis in a way that the readers do not have to put the moves manually could be productive. > >And is it not so that I contributed something to computerches aswell >I am always trying to help as much as I can but then later on get punished for >this >Ok I know that I am always make glory of my work (because no one else does wich >already hurts me) 1)The fact that people use some of your ideas is not a proof that they did not think about the same ideas independently. 2)Blaming other people for not respecting your work is not productive. You can avoid contributing if you are not asked to do it. If you send programmers a lot of ideas or a lot of analysis when you are not asked to do it then you can expect not to be respected for it. It is better to send only a small part of your work and tell the programmers that if they want more information then they have to ask for it. I believe that if programmers ask you for information and you give it to them they will not deny your contribution. 3)Writing your thoughts more clearly can be productive. I believe that sometimes people do not want to read information because the way that you write without looking at the content. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.