Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 15:12:45 09/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2000 at 16:50:25, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 07, 2000 at 16:23:49, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>And indeed Mogens I am extremely disapointed I was neglacted by Schroder BV >>cause I see to many people becomming a betta tester who never contributed >>something of importance and later asume they are some great personelety because >>the fact they are betatesters. > >Why be disappointed about that? There's a lot more interesting things to do than >be a betatester IMHO. But you're right, some are not as good as they think they >are. I probably stink at it, but who knows, I haven't tried it that many times >myself. I contemplated applying for a chance at Schröder, but I couldn't think >of any qualifications I posess, so why bother. Besides, the choice is pretty >easy if it's between helping a programmer I know personally and a software >company. Though the latter may make you feel more important. But it's just an >illusion. > >Mogens. I think your close to the point But I think you shall have also more conection with the programer when it's a comercial program and ofcourse you can get some payment for it And on the otherhand when the programer of an amateur program seriously wants to cooperate I am glad to help him out aswell just ask and I'll be there
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.